The leftist objections about passing on leverage over India's foreign policy to US, seem misplaced and far from reality. Yesterday I was watching a news channel and it was appalling to find many parliamentarians oblivious of what actual the deal is and its implications. Unfortunately, the text which has been made public a few days back, has attracted more rhetoric than critique. So much for much talked about largest democracy. The Communist Party of India (Marxist) (CPM)'s website parrots its opposition but does not enlist what are the specific issues it has over the deal.
Some facts-
- India has 14 reactors in commercial operation and nine under construction
- Nuclear power supplies about 3% of India's electricity
- By 2050, nuclear power is expected to provide 25% of the country's electricity
- India has limited coal and uranium reserves
- Its huge thorium reserves - about 25% of the world's total - are expected to fuel its nuclear power programme long-term
Since economic liberalization on 1991, Indian economy and consequently industry breathed a new lease of life. Securing energy, the backbone to economy, obviously is the top most priority of Indian Government. What India needs most urgently is public infrastructure and Energy, which Industry recognizes and hence has come out in open to support the deal.
The deal guarantees India fuel supplies for its civilian programme, and allows it to reprocess spent fuel. The debate over strategic compromise is ridiculous as well. Reuters say-
"
The pact has to be approved by Congress, while India needs to get clearances from the Nuclear Suppliers Group of nations that govern global civilian nuclear trade and also conclude an agreement to place its civilian reactors under U.N. safeguards.
"The United States will support an Indian effort to develop a strategic reserve of nuclear fuel to guard against any disruption of supply over the lifetime of India's reactors," the text said.
While both countries would have the right to end the pact with a year's advance notice and demand the return of fuel and equipment transferred, "the two parties recognize that exercising the right of return would have profound implications for their relations", the agreement said.
In what Indian officials said was an indirect reference to a future Indian nuclear test, the pact said the two sides had agreed to take into account whether "circumstances that may lead to termination" resulted from a "changed security environment" or "a response to similar actions by other states".
In other words, if Pakistan or China conducted nuclear tests, the U.S. would take that into account if Indian responded.
Pakistan seems as confused as the left parties on the deal. Pakistan has warned that the accord threatens regional stability, saying it would allow its arch rival to produce more atomic bombs. I would not find fault with their apprehension as it is stemming out of years of mistrust and misadventures. The deal has taken already 2 years since originally proposed during 2005 visit of Dr.Manmohan Singh to US. It may take a couple of more months for all parties involved to understand the intent and the construct of the deal and how it serves strategic purposes. In many ways, the agreement which will last for at least 40 years, is attempting to reverse 30 years of cold war time adversarial relationship between India and US. Truely, if and when it goes through historic milestone will be created.